>I'm proud of that one because I was able to send two (2) transactions
>back-to-back fast enough to have e-gold think my account still had
funds in
>it. Meaning, the first transaction would have zeroed out the
account, and
>the second transaction should have been rejected. But, instead, it
accepted
>both because the first transaction didn't remove the amount of gold
before
>it spent it to another account, so the second transaction was able to
>withdraw even more before the first transaction caught up.
Good grief! It's hard to believe there would be such a fundamental
error in a financial database!
Sidd.
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
