>Good grief! It's hard to believe there would be such a
fundamental
>error in a financial
database!
>
>Sidd.
Well, there was...
For those
that are trying to go look at the negative balance--it seems to have been
eradicated by the Ninth Amendment Foundation. I'm not sure of the Ninth
Amendment Foundations's relation to e-gold, but for some reason it was important
to them that the negative balance not remain on display. Thanks also to
Viking Coder who must have finished up any remaining negative amount due to the
"payment receive fee" that the Ninth Amendment Foundation forgot about.
I'm going to miss being able to brag about it, but at the same time...thanks for
the silver, we're approximately 7.8 silver ounces (or $34 US dollars)
richer now.
This is the HTML capture from our account history...
| 03/23/2001 01:53 |
Payment Received | 2311648 | Silver | +7.780000 | 9 | 7.780000 oz | 4.34 |
| From: Ninth Amendment Foundation | |||||||
| Memo: you never asked the foundation... | |||||||
| 03/23/2001 01:53 |
Payment Receive Fee | 2311648 | Silver | -0.077800 | 0.077800 oz | 4.34 | |
| Memo: you never asked the foundation... | |||||||
| 03/23/2001 05:45 |
Payment Received | 2313491 | Silver | +0.096454 | 420000 | 3.000003 g | 4.33 |
| From: Viking Coder | |||||||
| 03/23/2001 05:45 |
Payment Receive Fee | 2313491 | Silver | -0.000965 | 0.029997 g | 4.33 | |
Deen Foxx (CTO)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
