>a) Cops, National Guards, and Armys have no business telling a private >company what services they can offer, and to whom. The only people who have >an absolute RIGHT to decide who gets on or off the plane is the company >offering the flight. If we allow the army to starting telling private >citizens who they can and cannot do business with,
I disagree Craig, in the specific case of an airplane flying over populated areas, or other similar examples such as say "a truck moving explosives" and the like .. in those cases the Gov. probably has the right to tell the Airline many things, eg, dont fly today there's a hurricane, dont fly in this area its set aside for kite flyers today, dont fly with such and such a mechanical problem, etc. I think. Quite simply say a criminal was getting on the plane (a theif or whatever - nothing to do with war etc -- someone who it was suspected would pickpocket all the passnegers in 1ts class during the flight) -- it would be a normal act of jurisprudence to arrest or detain that person, IMHO. > then there is no logical >reason why they couldn't tell us what to eat, drink, wear, or how to live. >This is an act of a police state. I'm not saying the US is a police state. >I'm simply saying that this type of action is only committed with the same >logical reasoning that goes into a police state. > >b) There has been no declared war, True enough .. > even if one were to tolerate such actions >during wartime. > >c) There is no 'c)' > >SnowDog http://www.capitalismmagazine.com/2001/september/jl_why_us_atacked.htm http://www.capitalismmagazine.com/2001/september/jl_nihilism.htm --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Did you know that e-metal is a wonderful holiday gift? Avoid the hassle this year!
