> IF they had made some effort to do this (and prevent OR discourage ON PAR > exchanges of OSpyrite) -- then at least they could now say "I told you so -- > we did what we could to distance and DIFFERENTIATE E-gold from OSpyrite, > don't blame us".
(begin quotes) http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04043.html > We do not wish to be associated, even indirectly, with osgold.com; > therefore, we have removed all links from the e-gold website to websites > that link or make reference to osgold.com. > > Reid Jackson > Managing Director > Gold & Silver Reserve, Inc. http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04090.html > > Even with this action of supposedly distancing themselves, e-gold have > > not in any way prevented themselves from being lumped together with > > OSgold by the media. The media will do it anyway... they are unlikely > > to even be aware of e-gold's *distancing* policy. > > At which point, e-gold can point to this specific action and say > "NAYYHHH... TTHHBBBPPP!!!" or much more probably, something more > diplomatic. > > Viking Coder (end quotes) > I would tend to agree with you on some points. Particularly the issue of > "guilt by association". (begin quotes) http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04086.html > That certain exchange providers are lending e-gold's credibility to OSGold > by the combination of an approved link from e-Gold and the exchange > providers' subsequent recommendations of OSGold is a situation that e-gold, > and GS&R as their operator is well justified in seeking immediately to stop. > > That 'guilty by association' is a real threat to be avoided is clear > > Ian Green http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04085.html > Especially if it fits into the *scam* category as you suggest. No, it > is very unlikely that this is the motivation behind e-gold's action. > > Sidd. http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04092.html > As far as the deletion of the affiliates of OSGold -- I don't see what the > problem is? E-gold isn't restricting anyones business, they are simply > denying promotion of OSGold through their website. > > Methinks many hypocrites lurk here. > > Major Bosco http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04096.html > If OSgold is as great a profit center as everyone says, the de-listed > affiliates shouldn't even miss e-gold. > > Major Bosco http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04093.html > E-gold's silly move will only hasten their demise as the dominant gold > economy site, directory site and gold currency. Surely it does nothing good > > David Hillary http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04052.html > Your actions seem rather hasty, in my modest (unsolicited) opinion. ... > we wake up to find out that e-gold does not want to be associated with > OSGold (cool, so don't be...no big deal) so they have terminated links to > the MM's who DO want to be associated with OSGold. This kind of reminds me > of the way my nephew dislikes sharing his Tonka Toy dump truck with my > niece, so he hides it under the bed when she wakes from her naps! > > Eric Gaither, President > Gaithmans Gold Nation, Inc. http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04079.html > I am now tending to favour osgold over e-gold as: > > 1) The service is excellent > 2) They do not make covert and snide attempts to dissuade people from > useing e-gold but rely on their customer service to bring them business. > > Chuck (markab23) (end quotes) --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common viruses.
