What I did was for every possible initial hand, determine the best strategy by
adding up the payouts for all possible continuations and choosing the strategy
with the best average payout. This took quite a lot of computer time
(about 120
hours on a pretty fast machine), but in the end I ended up with a list of
strategy's that has a net advantage of 1.2%.

I wonder about your analysis here Edwin... (how much computer power did it take??!)

Let me know if I do something wrong on one of the following lines:

Number of possible hands 53 x 52 x 51 x 50 x 49 / 120* = 2.9 million

possible ways to discard 1+ 5 + 10 + 10 + 5 + 1 =  32   (== 92.8 m
discard-hands)

for each of the 32, possible draws are 48 + 48.47/2 + 48.47.46/6 +
48.47.46.45/24 + 48.47.46.45.44/120 respectively

== 1 +
48 +
  1128 +
17296 +
194580 +
1712304

respectively for each group

so for each of 2.9 million hands, there are

1 + 240 + 11280 + 172960 + 972900 + 1712304 possible outcomes (2,869,685)

thus,

(1) for each of the 2.9 million hands:

(2) you looked at the 32 possible plays.

(3) in each case (of the 32) you examined all possible 2.8 million
outcomes (there are about 2.8 million possible outcomes altogether --
some of the 32 have less, some more, possibile outcomes)

(4) indeed of the 32 ways to play each hand, you TALLIED over the 2.8
million possible outcomes  viz a viz each of the 32 possibilities,
and decided, for that particular hand (ie, of the 2.9 million hands -
see point 1) what the actual BEST play of the 32 plays possible, is,
ie looking to maximize outcome for that one hand

Thus for the 2.9 million hands of joker poker, you actually have an
enormous table of the single best way statstically (of the 32
possibile plays) to play that particular hand ?!

You had to determine the payout of roughly 8.12 x 10^12 (!) hands to
do this. (Hell, I imagine you just "wrote down" a big hash first with
the payout of each of the 2.9 million sorted jokerpoker hands, rather
than "calculating" that each time - that would have been the least of
your troubles eh!)

Thus, you have the PURE joker poker play book - for all 2.9 million
hands, you have written down the best possible (of the 32) discard
plays!!  You figured it out by, for each of the 32 x 2.9 million,
figuring out every possible result (ie depending on how the remains
of the deck is shuffled) and figuring which is the 32 is thus
highest-paying-out


Is that what you did Edwin?? Are computers that fast (10^13 rsults to look at?), I have no grasp of the problem??!!!

I may well have screwed a factor of 10 or so here and there, but
still. is the above right??? Please let me know!  Perhaps I forgot to
fold something down or some such. :O

JP!!


*naturally, ordering doesn't matter





Edwin

runty



--


---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common viruses.

Reply via email to