At 9:04 AM +1300 11/19/03, Sidd wrote:
...
>So let's re-word my original statement. IMO Pecunix and Goldmoney are 
>  more serious because they have PROOF that they have the gold in a 
>vault. 

Frankly, Sidd, I see little difference with e-gold's examiner (and
nobody has ever touched stats). I believe the gold in e-gold is
there, if I did not I'd be gone. I have various reasons to believe
this, and frankly being a part of a scam would be boring to me,
as well as more technically challenging to a talented team than
just running an honest system. Can you prove to me that Via
Mat blue seal 0100601 is intact by alleging it on the internet?
No, not even with a PGP signature. I have no idea if it's there
or broken! PROVE to me it's one or the other, Sidd! (Take a
lot of time & money to do it, too!) See how you sound??!

>Furthermore the babble about accountants not being trustworthy 
>is nonsense, 

Bull. Accounting has undergone massive changes in the past
few years in the USA. Arther Andersen was (WAS!!!) a HUGE
company, and while it's no surprise their competition thinks
e-gold should have spent money on them, it's not particularly
relevant for ordinary users once it's pointed-out, IMO. Your
yammering can't change the fact that Andersen DIED, and a
LOT of trust has died with them. Like it or not, it's FACT, not
"nonsense." I don't trust most accountants anymore.

I also think you discount the importance of personal reputation
and integrity. Doug could be a half-million dollar+ a year doctor
if he wanted to; he's doing e-gold because e-gold needed to be
done when he did it. It's no surprise the late-comers attack his
original creation, but the attacks need to be taken with a grain 
of salt IMO. 

>Pecunix has at least 2 other independent parties (who 
>aren't accountants) scrutinising the gold store. Each of these 

Go read the user agreement, there are independent parties
involved in the e-gold system, too. Ya know, the last time
this debate happened, "OSgold" quickly followed, I'm just
wondering which fake-currency is gonna die this time while
all attention is distracted towards the oldest gold currency
with AN EXCELLENT 7 YEAR REPUTATION...

As for vague customer service allegations, see Frank's
comments. The right of association is hardly weak if they
use it so often (hell, I didn't want to associate with *your*
"Charity Chase" site, Sidd! I dislike MLM, it's scammers in
my opinion in many/most cases!).
JMR
 



---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) 
via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common 
viruses.

Reply via email to