On Sat, Jan 24 2015, "Vick, Matthew" <matthew.v...@intel.com> wrote:
> Good catch! I noticed this too and was getting a patch together to address > this. > > The difference is that I was planning on not silently accepting an invalid > VLAN ID to begin with and returning FM10K_ERR_PARAM if the VLAN was > invalid, which I think is a better approach for this situation. If it's > alright with you, I'll generate the patch shortly and credit you via your > Reported-by. Sure, do what you think is best. Rasmus ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet _______________________________________________ E1000-devel mailing list E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired
