On 1/23/15, 4:50 PM, "Rasmus Villemoes" <li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk> wrote:
>On Sat, Jan 24 2015, "Vick, Matthew" <matthew.v...@intel.com> wrote: > >> Good catch! I noticed this too and was getting a patch together to >>address >> this. >> >> The difference is that I was planning on not silently accepting an >>invalid >> VLAN ID to begin with and returning FM10K_ERR_PARAM if the VLAN was >> invalid, which I think is a better approach for this situation. If it's >> alright with you, I'll generate the patch shortly and credit you via >>your >> Reported-by. > >Sure, do what you think is best. > >Rasmus Sounds good. I'll get the patch created and validated through Jeff's tree. Cheers, Matthew ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ E1000-devel mailing list E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired
