On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 13:57 -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Use the standard #defines for PCIe Capability ASPM fields.
> 
> Previously we used PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S and PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1
> directly, but
> these are defined for the Linux ASPM interfaces, e.g.,
> pci_disable_link_state(), and only coincidentally match the actual
> register
> bits.  PCIE_LINK_STATE_CLKPM, also part of that interface, does not
> match
> the register bit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
> CC: Jeff Kirsher <[email protected]>
> CC: Jesse Brandeburg <[email protected]>
> CC: Bruce Allan <[email protected]>
> CC: Carolyn Wyborny <[email protected]>
> CC: Don Skidmore <[email protected]>
> CC: Greg Rose <[email protected]>
> CC: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <[email protected]>
> CC: Alex Duyck <[email protected]>
> CC: John Ronciak <[email protected]>
> CC: [email protected]
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c |   11 +++++++++--
>  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) 

Thanks I will add this patch to my queue for e1000e.  Since this is
patch 7 of 12, are there PCI dependent patches in the series that need
to be applied before?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel&#174; Ethernet, visit 
http://communities.intel.com/community/wired

Reply via email to