On 21/05/2013 21:15, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 15:29 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote: >> Many of the questions you asked are covered in our RFC cover letter, but >> I will touch them briefly >> >> On 21/05/2013 15:06, Alex Rosenbaum wrote: >>> 1. It seem this patch does not cover epoll/select and such IO muxing APIs? >> >> We are thinking about how to implement epoll support as one of the next >> steps. >> >> What benchmarks are you using to test poll/select/epoll? > [...] > > I raised this issue back at Plumbers and I thought Jesse said poll() was > covered. It's likely to be a bit of a toy without that. Also, UDP?
The current patchset covers poll/select for UDP. Adding poll/select for TCP should be simple, I will try to include it in the next version. Epoll should see a gain from the above in the case where all the polled file descriptors are associated to the same device queue. A fuller implementation, in the epoll itself would be needed to cover multiple queues/devices. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may _______________________________________________ E1000-devel mailing list E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired
