[...] > I'm not yet for or against this particular approach (invoke(*) instead > of events) but I don't see the difference between using annotations for > the lifecycle vs annotations with values. ex: @AboutToShow vs > @Lifecycle(IWorkbenchConstants.ABOUT_TO_SHOW) except adding extra code > to the invoke(*) processing. > > I'd still go with general annotations. We could define @Lifecycle and > have the lifecycle annotations like @AboutToShow extend @Lifecycle > (allowing them to be found more easily). >
Annotation don't support inheritance! Tom -- B e s t S o l u t i o n . a t EDV Systemhaus GmbH ------------------------------------------------------------------------ tom schindl geschäftsführer/CEO ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eduard-bodem-gasse 5-7/1 A-6020 innsbruck fax ++43 512 935833 http://www.BestSolution.at phone ++43 512 935834 _______________________________________________ e4-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
