+1 for option 2 and the date. I want to take another stab at the filtered tree and it would be nice if that was finished in 0.13
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Lars Vogel <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for option #2 > On 6 Feb 2013 16:53, "Paul Webster" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> See *Bug 396249* <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=396249> - >> Builds >> for 4.2 and 4.3 e4 tools >> >> With Juno SR2 wrapping up, we want to focus on Kepler, but that has >> implications for the tooling to support Eclipse4, as things like the model >> start to diverge. >> >> We have 2 options: >> >> 1) publish a current snapshot of 0.13 as the Juno-SR2-0.13 compatible >> version and keep going >> >> 2) wrap up E4 0.13 (we don't release, as we're still an incubator) and >> move to 0.14 for Kepler. >> >> I'm kinda favouring Option #2 (make sure 0.13 builds and runs against >> Juno, and then move on with 0.14 for Kepler) but YMMV. >> >> Chime in with what you think and we'll talk about it in the meeting >> tomorrow. >> >> Later, >> Paul >> >> -- >> Paul Webster >> Hi floor. Make me a sammich! - GIR >> _______________________________________________ >> e4-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev >> >> > _______________________________________________ > e4-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev > >
_______________________________________________ e4-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
