Hi Eric, I think 1.) would be the right thing. 2.) feels like a duplication of model fragments and model processors to me.
Best regards, Lrs 2013/7/10 Eric Moffatt <[email protected]> > I'm currently looking at what we're going to do as far as extension points > go to enable folks to contribute e4 (DI) code into the IDE and I want to > get some feedback from the e4 community as to the best way for me to do > this... > > I have two possible approaches: > > 1) Extend the current IDE extension points with e4-specific sections (i.e. > extend the existing org.eclipse.ui.views EP to allow the addition of 'e4 > View') > 2) Provide separate extension points for the e4 bits (i.e. clone the > existing org.eclipse.ui.views EP and tweak it to be e4-related > > Do you *want* e4 specific extension points ? This is independent of having > the ability to contribute them through fragment / model processing (which > we'll also be working on in Luna). The BOF at last year's eclipsecon didn't > come to a resolution on this (at least not one that I remember..;-). > > Let me know what you think, > Eric > > > _______________________________________________ > e4-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev > >
_______________________________________________ e4-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
