Having dialogs and wizards in the model would definitely be more consistent IMHO. Am 09.10.2013 11:50 schrieb "Tom Schindl" <[email protected]>:
> On 07.10.13 16:50, Markus A. Kuppe wrote: > > On 10/07/2013 04:37 PM, Lars Vogel wrote: > >> I personally think the lack of Pojo programming support for the Eclipse > IDE > >> is preventing a larger ecosystem to provide Eclipse 4 extensions. So > your > >> work started for POJO views in > >> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=356511 was really great. > >> Having the same of handlers would help. Maybe it could be used to build > a > >> perspective switcher which works in the IDE and the RCP applications. > > > > Hi, > > > > the same goes for PreferencePages. Ideally, the preference page extesion > > point ("org.eclipse.ui.preferencePages") would accept POJOs and not just > > instances implementing org.eclipse.ui.IWorkbenchPreferencePage (similar > > to bug #356511). > > Before doing this I'd like us to discuss in more general if Dialog & > Wizards should not get part of the model! > > Tom > _______________________________________________ > e4-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev >
_______________________________________________ e4-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
