+1 to leave it up to the committer... Am 22.11.2013 09:39, schrieb Daniel Megert: > +1 to leave it up to the committer. It's just crazy to be forced to go > via Gerrit if one wants to e.g. quickly fix a typo or a simple warning > in the code. > > Dani > > > From: Markus Alexander Kuppe <[email protected]> > To: E4 Project developer mailing list <[email protected]> > Date: 22.11.2013 09:35 > Subject: Re: [e4-dev] Mandatory Gerrit usage for the e4 project? > Sent by: [email protected] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > On 11/22/2013 09:28 AM, Daniel Rolka wrote: > > Sometimes Gerrit unnecessary slows down the development - you have to > > wait for somebody to review your changes. It is especially painful when > > you handle several things simultaneously. So I'm not sure if we should > > make it the mandatory step after becoming the committer. Every committer > > can take the code and adjust it when they think sth can be > > refactored/implement in better way. Hovever I think, introducing some > > changes that can break sth/block sb or you are not sure if it is correct > > we should commit changes via Gerrit to get feedback, > > > > +1 for preparing the Hudson build for E4 > > +1 to make it a judgment call for the individual committer (people over > process). > > M. > _______________________________________________ > e4-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > e4-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
_______________________________________________ e4-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
