On 03.02.14 19:36, Tom Schindl wrote: > Hm - ok I see so the best solution would if we'd have a slot in the > application model which takes an EObject. I doubt we can get something > like this in into the model at this point of the lifecycle, we need > something like > > EMap<String,EObject> metaData >
I revert that - it seems to danagerous to store EObjects because we probably can't load the model but like Eric pointed out you could serialize your model as XMI and store it inside the persistedState. Tom _______________________________________________ e4-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
