I agree with this. One addition point: will there be an option for making classes package-private instead of the methods (where possible)?
I prefer package-private classes whereever possible, because I see them in the Project View with a different icon. Tom On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 11:08:09 +0200, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jonas_Kvarnstr=F6m?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I run code inspection build #629 still suggests that I make > package-private members protected instead. It should only suggest > public -> protected -> package-private -> private. > _______________________________________________ Eap-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-bugs
