These are good news, thanks! Tom
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002 18:30:01 +0400, "Maxim Shafirov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Both package-private for top-level classes and visibility access order fixed > in #630. Thank you! > > -- > > Best regards, > Maxim Shafirov > JetBrains, Inc / IntelliJ Software > http://www.intellij.com > "Develop with pleasure!" > > > "Thomas Singer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I agree with this. > > > > One addition point: will there be an option for making classes > > package-private instead of the methods (where possible)? > > > > I prefer package-private classes whereever possible, because I see > > them in the Project View with a different icon. > > > > Tom > > > > > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 11:08:09 +0200, > > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jonas_Kvarnstr=F6m?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > When I run code inspection build #629 still suggests that I make > > > package-private members protected instead. It should only suggest > > > public -> protected -> package-private -> private. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Eap-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-bugs
