I think in general that the IntelliJ team select the right things to fix but if they do that, and don't look at the votes at all, why do then waist time and the votes on voting?
Some builds ago (644) I looked into the list and counted up: We have together voted for 421 features/bugs and used 10759 votes on it. Only 5 out of 497 fixes is something we voted for, and we only used 91 voted for it. Now there is more fixes, but none that we voted for. I'm going to save the rest of my votes for the next EAP. At that time the team properly will have more time to look at the votes. Any way... you are right that the top voted issues is not small fixes, but there is still a lot of simple things that people have voted for. /Bertel "Jon Steelman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message am8oaq$g8l$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:am8oaq$g8l$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Well, I can't speak for IntelliJ, but some of the top voted issues are > not a quick fix (read serious loads of work and potentially destablizing > as we draw near to the Adriana finish) and some of the issues also have > limited appeal. Yes, there is a small group of people who clamor for > this or that feature but the broad appeal is thin. On the non-trivial > side of things, thorough support of something like AspectJ is not a > trivial task. I don't expect that an issue with comparable complexity > can be realistically accomplished in time for Adriana, but will likely > get good attention in the planning stage for the post-Adriana feature > set. The IntelliJ guys accomplish so much that it skews one's > perspective into thinking they can get everything into Adriana. > > Cheers, > Jon > > Glen Stampoultzis wrote: > > I've been noticing that the top voted bugs have been sitting around unfixed for many versions. Does Intellij actually look at the votes when deciding what to fix? > _______________________________________________ Eap-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-bugs
