Maybe we don't have to worry: http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=4091&browserPos=250
Appears to be fixed in 649. Apparently this is an "editing slow" problem. try it again with that release, and see if it is better. Mike On 23 Sep 2002 at 7:39, Michael Kirby wrote: > I have EJB support on, but we don't do EJB. > > There has to be _some_ difference between your configuration and mine > that would make the difference. > > I am inclined to think it is something in the code itself. Perhaps > there is some kind of construct which is pathalogically difficult to > analyze in your specific instance. Your best bet to get it fixed > would be to have the intellij guys duplicate the problem with your > specific code. > > Mike > > > On 22 Sep 2002 at 12:54, Daniel Hoppe wrote: > > > I dare say our files are not so huge at all. About 2000 files which > > are all below 2000 lines. Everything is on local drives. The NT Task > > Manager shows that java eats up all the CPU-time. I'll give the > > 500ms for error checking a try and turn off the EJB support. > > > > Daniel > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael > > > Kirby Posted At: Saturday, September 21, 2002 1:17 PM Posted To: > > > bugs Conversation: Performance of 644 and 647 Subject: Re: > > > Performance of 644 and 647 > > > > > > > > > Is it like this one every file? Or just a couple big ones? Of > > > the big ones, how big are they? We have several 3000 line classes > > > for which performance is acceptable. Maybe its something with the > > > structure of the code itself. > > > > > > I'm assuming you aren't using networked drives. > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > On 19 Sep 2002 at 12:30, Richard S.Martin wrote: > > > > > > > I am also having a terrible experience with the performance > > > of 647. It > > > > definitely seems to be the Java code parsing because when > > > editing a plain > > > > text file it is fine. > > > > > > > > "top" shows that it is eating a lot of CPU when editing a > > > Java source file. > > > > > > > > I hope they do improve this in the final release version, > > > since this makes it > > > > unusable on my current dev box. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday 19 September 2002 11:01 am, Michael Kirby wrote: > > > > >�Are you sure its CPU? I run a 1600 athalon with 1g of > > > ram, and I haven't > > > > > had any problems at all. What operations are you doing > > > that are CPU > > > > > intensive? Do you see the CPU peg in the performance meter? > > > > >� > > > > >�Mike > > > > >� > > > > >� > > > > >�On 17 Sep 2002 at 10:13, Daniel Hoppe wrote: > > > > >� > > > > >�> Hi all, > > > > >�> > > > > >�> I've got a really big problem with the two latest > > > builds (644 and 647). > > > > >�> Both seem to eat cpu-cycles like I eat chips ;-), it's > > > really painfully > > > > >�> slow. I've got a P4 with 1,6Ghz and 1GB of Ram and can > > > hardly request a > > > > >�> faster machine to get my favourite IDE running... Is > > > there something I > > > > >�> could do to speed-up things? Maybe disable some > > > features I don't need? > > > > >�> Or is this just the normal debug-code which slows > > > everything down? > > > > >�> > > > > >�> Cheers, > > > > >�> > > > > >�> Daniel > > > > >�> > > > > >�> _______________________________________________ > > > > >�> Eap-bugs mailing list > > > > >�> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >�> http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-bugs > > > > >�> > > > > >� > > > > >�--- > > > > >�[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >�To obtain my PGP public key, mail "SEND PUB KEY" in the > > > > >�subject to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > > > >� > > > > >�_______________________________________________ > > > > >�Eap-bugs mailing list > > > > >�[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >�http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-bugs > > > > >� > > > > > > > > > > > ============================================================== > > > ================ > > > > This email and any files transmitted with it are > > > confidential and intended solely for the use of the > > > individual or entity to whom they are addressed. All > > > information is the view of the individual and not necessarily the > > > company. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby > > > notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this > > > communication and its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you > > > have received this email in error please notify: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ============================================================== > > > ================ > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Eap-bugs mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-bugs > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > To obtain my PGP public key, mail "SEND PUB KEY" in the > > > subject to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Eap-bugs mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-bugs > > > > --- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To obtain my PGP public key, mail "SEND PUB KEY" in the > subject to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > _______________________________________________ > Eap-bugs mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-bugs > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] To obtain my PGP public key, mail "SEND PUB KEY" in the subject to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" _______________________________________________ Eap-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-bugs
