Nah, if you use code completion it'll suggest the getters.
Jonas Kvarnstr�m wrote:
> Here's a suggestion for a new intention action that just occurred to me:
> Suppose you try to access a private field from a class where this is not
> allowed, but there is a public getter or setter available. Maybe you
> could suggest replacing the field access with a call to the getter/setter?
>
> Don't know whether this is useful enough to be included or whether it
> would just be bloat, though... Any thoughts?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Eap-features mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
>
--
Erb
==============================================================
"The only time I like in the morning is afternoon."
- Russell D. Cooper
"If you do everything, then you're all done."
- Melissa F. Cooper
"Most of you are familiar with the virtues of a programmer.
There are three, of course: laziness, impatience, and hubris."
- Larry Wall
==============================================================
_______________________________________________
Eap-features mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
