that does not sound compelling at all. I can use any existing entry as a template for the next one by using the copy command. I would recommend to at least let the user rename the "default" thing (better: remove he default concept completely). I have a project with 5 different run configs, and I always have a problem remembering which was the one hidden under the "default" name.
best - Christian >The intent of the <default> entry is that it is always used as a prototype >when creating a new configuration (using "Add New Configuration" button). >It may e.g. include some typical program/vm parameters you use in all (or >almost all) configurations. > >Best regards, >Valentin Kipiatkov >----------------------------------------------------------- > IntelliJ Software, <a href='http://www.intellij.com/' >target='_top'>http://www.intellij.com/</a> > "Develop with pleasure" >----------------------------------------------------------- > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Christian Sell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:12 PM >Subject: [Eap-list] 507 run/debug configs > > >> Hello, >> >> All entries in the run/debug configurations can (and must be) be given >> descriptive names - except one, which is called "default" by idea. This is >> strange - what does the "default" mean? In what sense (if any) does the >> "default" entry differ from other entries? Why cant I give it a >descriptive >> name? >> >> regards, >> Christian Sell _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
