Maybe an idea for a low-cost "small-guy" license would include a limit 
on project sizes.
Is it a good assumption that low-income or no-income development 
projects probably
won't be using 1000 source files?  I know there will be exceptions, but 
there has
to be some way to try to keep the profitable developers from getting the 
cheap version.

Wangjammer5 wrote:

> 
>>Wangjammer5 wrote:
>>
> 
>>>There are so many free solutions out there, the "bang for buck" has to be
>>>HUGE to differentiate something like IDEA from free IDEs. Most of the
>>>
> 
>>I think it is. There's lightyears between IDEA and free IDEs.
>>
> 
> I completely agree with that. 
> 
> 
>>>major commercial IDEs have an non-time limited free version for personal
>>>use. IDEA doesn't, and that's probably why you're seeing lots of eval key
>>>requests every 3 weeks.
>>>
>>>
> 
>>Those free versions have certain features disabled.  Which features
>>would you be
>>willing to do without in IDEA?
>>
> 
> Well, none really. However at the current price level our small 
> development team simply cannot justify the expense - especially when you 
> can get a new eval key easily.
> 
> However, if it became impossible to get new eval keys, I am sure we 
> wouldn't all  register at the current (even reduced $200) price.
> 
> It would be a sad day indeed for us to go back to another IDE. I 
> desperately want all of our team to have IDEA, but the current price is 
> (for us) prohibitive. I've sold software myself (end-user as well as 
> software components) and my experience has shown that lower prices yield 
> more customers, and eventually more income.
> 
> Just my suggestion. We're not all in large enterprises that will pay 
> $200-$400 per user.
> 
> Wouldn't a $50-$100 single user license with no support (but updates of 
> course) be a good plan? The main thing corporates want is support when 
> things go wrong... us corporate outcasts just have to put up and wait for 
> a public upgrade ;-)
> 
> I really believe in the long term the money made with a much lower price 
> would beat the income from the higher priced version, but hey maybe I'm 
> wrong. At least with a lower price you can tell people to forget their 
> volume discounts.
> 
> I realise I'm going against the grain here. I just thought I'd share my 
> real-world observations about this.
> 
> Heck, I recommended IDEA to my main client and they immediately bought 
> several licenses. I'm sure even they would have bought more licenses 
> (hehe one for me too) if the price was lower - and they are a large company. 
> 
> Cheers
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Eap-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
> 
> 


-- 

Erb

==============================================================
"The only time I like in the morning is afternoon."
     - Russell D. Cooper

"If you do everything, then you're all done."
     - Melissa F. Cooper

"Most of you are familiar with the virtues of a programmer.
There are three, of course: laziness, impatience, and hubris."
     - Larry Wall
==============================================================


_______________________________________________
Eap-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list

Reply via email to