Rick,
> 1. Add a 'tabbed field' for the throws clause of
> the method being generated
Don't you think that implementing the "lamp" (we call it
"intention action" here) for adding/removing throws clauses to the
method declaration automatically is better?.
> 2. For 'create field', differentiate between adding
> the field as a member, a local, or inlined as
> part of the statement. For example, if I don't
> declare ix as an int in a for loop:
> for( ix=0; ix<2;ix++ ) { }
> give me the option of putting the int declaration
> inside the for loop.
The action to created local/method parameter will be also
implemented.
Best regards,
Mike Aizatsky.
------------------------------
IntelliJ Software, "Develop with pleasure!" http://www.intellij.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On
> Behalf Of Vestal, Rick
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:43 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: [Eap-list] "from unknown reference" suggestion
>
> Wow, I love this feature! I'm sure you aren't done
> with it, but here are a couple of suggestions just
> in case you don't have them on your list.
>
> 1. Add a 'tabbed field' for the throws clause of
> the method being generated
>
> 2. For 'create field', differentiate between adding
> the field as a member, a local, or inlined as
> part of the statement. For example, if I don't
> declare ix as an int in a for loop:
> for( ix=0; ix<2;ix++ ) { }
> give me the option of putting the int declaration
> inside the for loop.
>
>
> AWESOME!
>
> -- Rick
>
> _______________________________________________
> Eap-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
_______________________________________________
Eap-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
