Rick,
> Do you mean that if I type
> throw new Exception("test");
> in a method I'll get a lamp that could automatically add
> the exception to the throws clause of the method?
Even more. If you call some method which has throws clause
defined, the lamp will also popup.
> However, I still think that adding a tab field for
> the throws clause during the method generation is very
> natural and would be used extensively
We will consider this possibility.
Best regards,
Mike Aizatsky.
------------------------------
IntelliJ Software, "Develop with pleasure!" http://www.intellij.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On
> Behalf Of Vestal, Rick
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 2:06 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [Eap-list] "from unknown reference" suggestion
>
> >
> > > 1. Add a 'tabbed field' for the throws clause of
> > > the method being generated
> >
> > Don't you think that implementing the "lamp" (we call it
> > "intention action" here) for adding/removing throws clauses to the
> > method declaration automatically is better?.
> >
>
> Do you mean that if I type
> throw new Exception("test");
> in a method I'll get a lamp that could automatically add
> the exception to the throws clause of the method?
> Very nice indeed. Or did I miss your point...
>
> However, I still think that adding a tab field for
> the throws clause during the method generation is very
> natural and would be used extensively. I quite often
> know at least one exception that will be thrown from
> he method I am about to write.
>
> -- Rick
>
> _______________________________________________
> Eap-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
_______________________________________________
Eap-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
