No if the class contains statics only. But I would not mind having the warning displayed - I'd EXPECT it to be there !
Edo > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jason Boehle > Sent: 07 February 2002 14:21 > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [Eap-list] Bugs with Ariadna's unused > members/local variable feature. > > > But shouldn't it then be used within that class, like in a > factory method? > > Jason Boehle > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vestal, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 6:57 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [Eap-list] Bugs with Ariadna's unused > members/local variable feature. > > > I think only a private constructor that takes no arguments > should be made the special case (i.e. don't mark it as > unused). Lots of people do this to make sure that you cannot > create an instance of this class from outside the class > itself. So, the fact that it is unused is true, but it is > intentional and shouldn't be marked as unused. > > -- Rick > -----Original Message----- > From: Valentin Kipiatkov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 4:15 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Eap-list] Bugs with Ariadna's unused > members/local variable feature. > > > > Private constructors that are not used should not be marked > as unused. > > Why? > > _______________________________________________ > Eap-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-> list > _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
