Not within a utility class, that only has static methods. Tom
At 06:21 07.02.02 -0800, you wrote: >But shouldn't it then be used within that class, like in a factory method? > >Jason Boehle >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Vestal, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 6:57 AM >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >Subject: RE: [Eap-list] Bugs with Ariadna's unused members/local variable >feature. > > >I think only a private constructor that takes no arguments should be >made the special case (i.e. don't mark it as unused). Lots of people >do this to make sure that you cannot create an instance of this class >from outside the class itself. So, the fact that it is unused is true, but >it is intentional and shouldn't be marked as unused. > >-- Rick >-----Original Message----- >From: Valentin Kipiatkov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 4:15 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Eap-list] Bugs with Ariadna's unused members/local variable >feature. > > > > Private constructors that are not used should not be marked as unused. > >Why? > >_______________________________________________ >Eap-list mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
