Yes, hence the phrase "I would like the _option_ of making the generated name "newPropertyName" rather than "propertyName".
Kirk Michael Svinth wrote: >-1 (or optional) >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Kirk Woll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 6:39 AM >Subject: [Eap-list] Generate Setter parameter > > >>I recall this was asked for quite some time ago but I don't believe it >>is implemented yet. The generated setters default to the parameter name >>being the same as the property name. I do not like that style as I find >>it is needlessly begging for a coding mistake. I would like the option >>of making the generated name "newPropertyName" rather than "propertyName". >> >>Kirk >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Eap-list mailing list >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list >> > > >_______________________________________________ >Eap-list mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > > _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
