Not trying to pick a fight, but why? Waste of time? Kirk
Thomas Singer wrote: > -1 > > At 21:39 15.03.2002 -0800, you wrote: > >> I recall this was asked for quite some time ago but I don't believe >> it is implemented yet. The generated setters default to the >> parameter name being the same as the property name. I do not like >> that style as I find it is needlessly begging for a coding mistake. >> I would like the option of making the generated name >> "newPropertyName" rather than "propertyName". >> >> Kirk > > > > _______________________________________________ > Eap-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > > _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
