Two further questions:
1. Why is this not going to be supported? Missing required elements from a sequence seems to be a large piece of validation.
2. You mentioned invoking external validation from IntelliJ. How would we do this?
Thanks,
Robert Cranston
Programmer\Analyst
EFA Software Services
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Aizatsky [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 11:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Eap-list] 615:Still Problems with Schemas
Rob,
�
It is not planned to add on-the-fly checking of element ordering. You can always invoke external validation from the menu to perform full-featured validation.
�
Best regards,
Mike Aizatsky.
------------------------------
JetBrains, Inc / IntelliJ Software
<http://www.intellij.com>
"Develop with pleasure!"
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rob Cranston
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:25 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: Eric Gascoine; Perry Devetzis
Subject: [Eap-list] 615:Still Problems with Schemas
�
There still seems to be a problem with XML Schemas. For most of the validation they seem to work now, but the problem is with the "xs:sequence" elements. There is no validation on the ordering or on required elements inside sequences. You can remove required elements from inside sequences, or you can put them in in the wrong order and the validator does not complain.
Other than this the XML stuff is looking good!
Thanks,
Rob Cranston
