Hi Bart,

On Oct 1, 2013, at 10:31 PM, Bart Verleye wrote:
> I have installed a new toolchain, gmpolf-3.0.4.
> Now I want to install Paraview, which depends on quite a few other packages.

To save a few keystrokes, you can find pre-calculated templates for many 
of the common building blocks over here (shameless rip from pkgsrc's Makefiles):
https://github.com/fgeorgatos/easybuild.experimental/tree/master/contrib/pkgsrc/20130506
(sorry to the rest for being repetitive, but you know how convenient this can 
be...)

> During the installation, I came up with following comments:
> 
> - --try-toolchain is not recursive. Is that 'not yet', or is there a reason 
> behind that?

"Not yet", there is an open issue somewhere about it, AFAIK.

> - --try-toolchain produces a eb file, but does not copy it to the lib 
> directory at the end. Perhaps that could be added?

It's a bugture (contraption of bug-feature): manual work is expected.
In principle that requires heavy editing and is considered more of a template.

> - in one of my attemps, at the end of an installation, this error came up:
> (should only have 'files' and 'dirs' keys, values should be lists (at least 
> one non-empty)).
> This could be checked before compilation as part of the eb-file sanity check.

IMHO, the error-level should then be non-zero; I believe then the right thing 
will happen, no?

> During the installation of Qt, some "Project Messages" pop up, and the 
> waiting time during the configuration is sometimes large. As a result, eb 
> stops and prints:
[...]
> However, this message is not an error, and if I configure myself, without eb, 
> the whole process runs through. How can I avoid eb from stopping on these 
> messages?

Either the output has a keyword that makes EasyBuild tick (and requires tuning),
or the error-level is incorrect or, there is a bug (eh, or all of the above :).
Which case are we talking about here?

cheers,
Fotis

-- 
echo "sysadmin know better bash than english" | sed s/min/mins/ \
        | sed 's/better bash/bash better/' # Yelling in a CERN forum



Reply via email to