Hi again Valeriu, in reply to your question about using your existing compiler modules, it's technically possible but as you probably have noticed it's not straightforward
My suggestion would be to start using the default easybuild toolchains at least while you start testing and learning easybuild and once you feel confident with how easybuild works you can try to tweak it. Basically I think you will need to write your own easybuild toolchains which include your desired compiler modules. In my opinion, if you try to do this tweak in your first approach to easybuild it's going to be "hard" regards, pablo. 2014-11-21 15:00 GMT+01:00 Fotis Georgatos <[email protected]>: > > On Nov 21, 2014, at 2:55 PM, Fotis Georgatos <[email protected]> wrote: > > If your previous modules really function well as drop-in replacement, > this should work. > > Clarification: this statement is correct only if the symlinked software > builds > are relocatable themselves and do not make heavy assumptions about paths. > In sort, it’s not a great solution unless you are certain how bin/lib etc > behave. > > F. > > -- > echo "sysadmin know better bash than english" | sed s/min/mins/ \ > | sed 's/better bash/bash better/' # signal detected in a CERN forum > > > > > > > > -- Pablo Escobar López HPC systems engineer Biozentrum, University of Basel Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics SIB Email: [email protected] Phone: +41 61 267 21 80 http://www.biozentrum.unibas.ch
