Hi Ken, all,

On Nov 20, 2015, at 4:48 AM, Kenneth Hoste <[email protected]> wrote:
> That's just because --hide-deps does not apply to toolchains. I guess we 
> could extend it such that you can do that too.
> 
> I'm not sure whether we should go with a --hide-toolchains here, or just 
> allow to list toolchains in --hide-deps.
> 
> Any preference anyone?

Allowing to list toolchains provides for more control granularity, so it might 
prove more future-proof.
Could we invent a special operand (or the empty case) to default in the other 
behaviour?
As long as all configurations become reachable, the “how” is just a matter of 
taste against occam’s razor...

F.

-- 
echo "sysadmin know better bash than english" | sed s/min/mins/ \
  | sed 's/better bash/bash better/' # signal detected in a CERN forum






Reply via email to