Hi all, Personally I think an easier long term solution is a feature in the works for lmod (that I think Pablo mentioned) where you just tell lmod what to hide. That means you can do this kind of cleanup on the fly (today you might want netCDF hidden but tomorrow you might want to expose it).
Alan On 22 Nov 2015 20:53, "Fotis Georgatos" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ken, all, > > On Nov 20, 2015, at 4:48 AM, Kenneth Hoste <[email protected]> wrote: > > That's just because --hide-deps does not apply to toolchains. I guess we > could extend it such that you can do that too. > > > > I'm not sure whether we should go with a --hide-toolchains here, or just > allow to list toolchains in --hide-deps. > > > > Any preference anyone? > > Allowing to list toolchains provides for more control granularity, so it > might prove more future-proof. > Could we invent a special operand (or the empty case) to default in the > other behaviour? > As long as all configurations become reachable, the “how” is just a matter > of taste against occam’s razor... > > F. > > -- > echo "sysadmin know better bash than english" | sed s/min/mins/ \ > | sed 's/better bash/bash better/' # signal detected in a CERN forum > > > > > > > >
