Hi Kenneth, > -----Original Message----- > >> Does that help? > We have plans to deprecate some old/inactive toolchains; the ones I have in > mind are 'goalf', 'ictce' and 'iqacml'. > We won't drop 'goolf' though, since it is still being used actively (i.e., > we're > aware of people using it and we're getting pull requests for easyconfigs using > 'goolf').
I understand the trouble in dropping an actively used toolchain. Would it be an idea to have a comment like "deprecated" behind those toolchains that aren't actively maintained when getting the list with --list-toolchains? Or split the list in two sections: official/actively maintained toolchains and unofficial/community maintained toolchains? Kind regards, Erik Smeets -- The information contained in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged, and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. Unless explicitly stated otherwise in the body of this communication or the attachment thereto (if any), the information is provided on an AS-IS basis without any express or implied warranties or liabilities. To the extent you are relying on this information, you are doing so at your own risk. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. The sender nor the company/group of companies he or she represents shall be liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication, or for any delay in its receipt.
