Nah the 2016.11 (and 10) was never pushed. It was only used to build DALTON, and i need to update that anyway.
On 03/20/2017 12:34 PM, Joachim Hein wrote: > HI Åke, > > Thanks for the heads up. Is that in the EB distribution? I can’t see it > with “eb -S gimkl”. gimkl/2.11.5 is the newest I see. > > Best wishes > Joachim > > >> On 20 Mar 2017, at 12:26, Åke Sandgren <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> My latest gimkl is gimkl-2016.11.eb which contains >> GCC 6.2.0, ipmi and imkl 2017.1.132 >> >> So a gimkl based on foss/2017a + intel/2017a should probably be 2017a, >> just as the iomkl-2017a, based on foss/2017a + intel/2017a >> >> On 03/20/2017 11:30 AM, Joachim Hein wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> The current gimkl/2.11.5 is a bit long in the tooth (gcc 4.9.3 based). >>> If I want to build a more modern gimkl, what would be the naming >>> convention for this? Most likely I would pick a gcc 6.3 (same as foss >>> 2017a) and the Intel contents from the intel 2017a toolchain. >>> >>> Best wishes >>> Joachim >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Ake Sandgren, HPC2N, Umea University, S-90187 Umea, Sweden >> Internet: [email protected] Phone: +46 90 7866134 Fax: +46 90-580 14 >> Mobile: +46 70 7716134 WWW: http://www.hpc2n.umu.se > -- Ake Sandgren, HPC2N, Umea University, S-90187 Umea, Sweden Internet: [email protected] Phone: +46 90 7866134 Fax: +46 90-580 14 Mobile: +46 70 7716134 WWW: http://www.hpc2n.umu.se
