> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott > C. Best > Sent: 10 August 2007 19:46 > To: Brendon Baumgartner > Cc: echovnc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Echovnc-users] EchoRDP > > > > Not yet. :) We have an in-house application called > "serverMirror" > that could be easily updated to "offload" to TCP 3389, making it a good > candidate for tunneling RDP sessions. But then I think I should just make > it a connection-option in EchoVNC, rather than another application. What's > your opinion of which would be better?
Either is fine. I don't have enough experience with EchoVNC to say if it can cause problems where a lighter application would be more suited. Multiple access methods is also always better... being Windows and all. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Echovnc-users mailing list Echovnc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/echovnc-users
