Other thoughts on a transition to requiring Java 5? For a long time I waited to make sure everyone was ready... Now I think we should be safe.
Jashan Chittesh (Holger David Wagner) wrote: > Craig Setera schrieb: > >> EclipseME has required at least Eclipse 3.2 for quite some time. It is >> difficult to support older versions of Eclipse over time, so after a >> while I will drop support for 3.2 as well. (probably in a few months). >> I apologize for the difficulty this may cause some people, but that is >> the best I can do for a hobby project. >> >> This is actually an interesting lead-in to a question I have for the >> larger group. I've been considering dropping support for Java 1.4 and >> requiring Java 5 to run EclipseME. I believe the Eclipse platform is >> starting to move in the direction of requiring Java 5. How big of a >> problem would that be for people? >> > > No problem at all for me... Isn't the current Java Version even Java 6 > already? > > Same for Eclipse - my personal opinion on this is that once a current, > stable version of Eclipse has been available for a little while (maybe a > few months or half a year), it shouldn't be a problem to require that > version... > > That's just my personal opinion based on my personal development > process, though - obviously, others may have different needs... > > Kind regards, > David > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Eclipseme-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipseme-users
