Bill, You can file an enhancement request. More than likely what I will be looking into instead is using the J2ME polish XML device files instead. This is a "standard" and should do the job better than the current symbol definitions stuff. If I do that, there will likely be no user interface for defining the XML files other than an XML editor. The UI will be only for pointing to the device files and selecting a definition from those files.
Of course, this all implies that I find the time to do this work, which I'm having little luck doing. Between being very busy at work and outside work, I'm having a hard time finding much EclipseME time. I am certainly working on things, but it is slow. Hopefully everyone will be patient with me. Thanks, Craig Bill Gray wrote: > On the "other options" front, our build-system generates sets of flags > and stashes them in a properties file for use later when we feed them > into antenna's preprocessor. If the symbol set could be rigged to > simply link to such a file, it would be the final step of integration > between the two systems. Not sure if anyone else would find it useful, > mind. > > The properties file has, amongst other properties, one: > JPP_FLAG=SOME_FLAG,ANOTHER_FLAG,STILL_MORE_FLAGS,LAST_FLAG > > Is there a better place to add this sort of suggestion? Are enhancement > requests okay in the bug base? > > -- Bill > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of Craig Setera >> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 5:16 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Eclipseme-users] symbol set definitions >> >> Riddled? Yikes. >> >> I am aware that it isn't perfect. I'm currently pondering >> other options. As always, bug fix patches are welcome <grin> >> >> Ed Welch wrote: >> >>> I suppose you know already that the symbol set definitions >>> >> dialog is >> >>> bug riddled >>> >>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all >>> >> challenges. >> >>> Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> >>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> -- >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Eclipseme-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipseme-users >>> >>> >> -------------------------------------------------------------- >> ----------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all >> challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Eclipseme-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipseme-users >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Eclipseme-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipseme-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Eclipseme-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipseme-users
