XML file sounds great too - can easily retool the build system to spit
those out.
And I assure you I have the utmost patience for your updates :)

 -- Bill

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of Craig Setera
> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 6:27 AM
> To: '[email protected]'
> Subject: Re: [Eclipseme-users] symbol set definitions
> 
> Bill,
> 
> You can file an enhancement request.  More than likely what I 
> will be looking into instead is using the J2ME polish XML 
> device files instead.  
> This is a "standard" and should do the job better than the 
> current symbol definitions stuff.  If I do that, there will 
> likely be no user interface for defining the XML files other 
> than an XML editor.  The UI will be only for pointing to the 
> device files and selecting a definition from those files.
> 
> Of course, this all implies that I find the time to do this 
> work, which I'm having little luck doing.  Between being very 
> busy at work and outside work, I'm having a hard time finding 
> much EclipseME time.  I am certainly working on things, but 
> it is slow.  Hopefully everyone will be patient with me.
> 
> Thanks,
> Craig
> 
> Bill Gray wrote:
> > On the "other options" front, our build-system generates 
> sets of flags 
> > and stashes them in a properties file for use later when we 
> feed them 
> > into antenna's preprocessor.  If the symbol set could be rigged to 
> > simply link to such a file, it would be the final step of 
> integration 
> > between the two systems.  Not sure if anyone else would find it 
> > useful, mind.
> >
> > The properties file has, amongst other properties, one:
> > JPP_FLAG=SOME_FLAG,ANOTHER_FLAG,STILL_MORE_FLAGS,LAST_FLAG
> >
> > Is there a better place to add this sort of suggestion?  Are 
> > enhancement requests okay in the bug base?
> >
> >  -- Bill
> >
> >   
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of 
> >> Craig Setera
> >> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 5:16 AM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [Eclipseme-users] symbol set definitions
> >>
> >> Riddled?  Yikes.
> >>
> >> I am aware that it isn't perfect.  I'm currently pondering other 
> >> options.  As always, bug fix patches are welcome <grin>
> >>
> >> Ed Welch wrote:
> >>     
> >>> I suppose you know already that the symbol set definitions
> >>>       
> >> dialog is
> >>     
> >>> bug riddled
> >>>
> >>>       
> >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> -
> >>     
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>       
> >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> -
> >>     
> >>> --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all
> >>>       
> >> challenges. 
> >>     
> >>> Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> >>>
> >>>       
> >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> -
> >>     
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Eclipseme-users mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipseme-users
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------
> >> -----------
> >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. 
> >> Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Eclipseme-users mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipseme-users
> >>
> >>     
> >
> > 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all 
> challenges. 
> > Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Eclipseme-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipseme-users
> >   
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all 
> challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Eclipseme-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipseme-users
> 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Eclipseme-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipseme-users

Reply via email to