Did I mention that i still use Eclipse 3.2.x on my machine? May that be a difference?
The strange thing is that the error still perists if I deactivate both preprocessors. I'll try on a raw installation tomorrow, maybe my eclipse is to old and degenerated now. On previous releases there was a manual for "tweaking the hooks" or so - I did not find it any more. In the past I adjusted those settings, that was long before I used the antenna-plugin. That could be a problem too. Markus Craig Setera schrieb: > I just tested 1.7.7 and it seems to be doing the right thing in regards > to the preprocessor. It appears that this has to do with a > configuration with both EclipseME and the Antenna plugin. I'm not sure > I'm going to be able to help much on this one. The only preprocessing > changes in EclipseME 1.7.7 were to update to a latest snapshot of code > from the Antenna CVS. I only include the preprocessor in the EclipseME > plugin rather than the full Antenna binaries. > > Omry, any thoughts here? > > Thanks, > Craig > > Markus Sinner wrote: > >> Craig, >> >> i understood what Omry meant. The problems may be related to the mixture >> of EclipseME with preprocessor support and the Antenna-Plugin I use. >> >> I think there are people which use both plugins, as eclipseME does not >> really comfortably allow to compile different versions. I use eclipseME >> for developing and then build different versions with ant. >> >> Markus >> >> Craig Setera schrieb: >> >> >>> Omry, >>> >>> I think there is some confusion here. You are talking about your >>> Antenna plugin versus the EclipseME Antenna preprocessing support. >>> While that is fine to do, can you please make it really clear for others >>> on the list when you are referring to one versus the other? In the end, >>> I would assume that most people on this list do not have your plugin >>> installed in addition to EclipseME. >>> >>> Craig >>> >>> Omry Yadan wrote: >>> >>> >>>> you can either define straight in the code (//#define FOO='bar'), or >>>> enter it into the Antenna properties page (the text field labeled >>>> 'Defines', write FOO='bar' in it) >>>> >>>> >>>> Markus Sinner wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hm - where can i define such a symbol manually? I can only choose >>>>> symbol-sets. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Eclipseme-users mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipseme-users >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Eclipseme-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipseme-users >>> >>> >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Eclipseme-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipseme-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Eclipseme-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipseme-users
