On Tue, 31 May 2011 08:08:37 +0200 Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> This is getting a bit boring > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.cygwin/126998 > > Nobody seems to have a clue and everybody takes for granted that what ECL is > doing (dlopen of ephemeral DLLs) is not considered high priority by cygwin. > The solution that we are given is to assign ourselves addresses for loading > the DLLs but that is crazy because we have no idea where to place them in > order to avoid clashes. Are ephemeral DLLs also needed for bytecode? If not, perhaps that cygwin should for now only support bytecode, even though that's of course suboptimal... I imagine that cygwin users expect primarily good tools such as editors and toolchains, with mingw used for production. At least that was my case when I used to code for win32, I'd use cygwin for tools and its cygwin-mingw cross-compiler to generate final executables. That was only C though and I didn't know about ECL then. But can other ECL cygwin users relate to the above scenario? -- Matt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger. Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe, secure and there when you need it. Data protection magic? Nope - It's vRanger. Get your free trial download today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
