On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 22:38, Faré <fah...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Juanjo, > > is it OK with you if unbundle asdf-ecl from asdf.asd, and instead create > a somewhat portable asdf extension called asdf-bundle.asd ? > > Impact: when the unbundling is complete, ecl users will be encouraged to > (require :asdf-bundle) instead or in addition to (require :asdf) if they > want to use the extensions currently provided in asdf-ecl. > > But it will make the bundle-op operations available to other implementations > in a more portable way. > Also, and I probably need Michael's approval here, is it OK to re-publish the contents from asdf-ecl under an MIT license? That would make it much easier for many users if it had the same license as ASDF itself.
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org In a free market there are no market failures, only market opportunities. In a bureaucracy there is no possible success, only a perpetual ever-worsening crisis. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
