On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Faré <fah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> is it OK with you if unbundle asdf-ecl from asdf.asd, and instead create
> a somewhat portable asdf extension called asdf-bundle.asd ?
I would need some time to do that -- this means not before the next
release. What bundle operations make sense in other implementations?
Concatenating FASLs seems to work in SBCL (at least last time I tried), but
that, CLISP and CCL are about the implementations I have.
One thing that worries me about unbundling it is that being an extension,
ECL users no longer have it by default -- they have to make an extra effort.
Juanjo
--
Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain)
http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Ecls-list mailing list
Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
