Hello. Below is the diff between cl-test-grid results for ECL release 13.5.1 and the curren HEAD - commit c8a4d98d.
The bytecode compiler: http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/ecl/ecl-diff-2-bytecode.html The lisp to C compiler: http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/ecl/ecl-diff-2-lisp-to-c.html Clicking the test status in the reports opens the full output of the lisp process running the test, where we can find the failure/success details. If the test has failure in the right column (he current HEAD version, entitled here ecl-13.5.1-c8a4d98d-linux-i686-bytecode), but was successfull in the left column (the version from the previous release, entitled ecl-13.5.1-unknown-linux-i686-bytecode), this means we have a regression in the current HEAD. As we can see from the logs, the majority of the regressions are caused by the same error: #'47091880 FUNCTION: Not a valid argument 47091880. Sometimes the regressions are caused by some other errors. Best regards, - Antopn ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
