Le mardi 13 mars 2007 à 11:35 +0100, Stefan Paitoni a écrit : > Hello, > On what platform are you testing Drag&Drop ? => IE or FireFox
For the Drag&Drop the server side processing is the same as standard upload. But on the client side, there is a Base64 encoding that is required to send the binary files over Seam remoting. This base64 encoding can be very slow, espacially on Firefox where it is done inside the extension. We plan to optimize that : - change the encoding system (depends on Seam remoting too) or - embed a better base64 encoder on the client side Thx for your feedback. Tiry > > > I currently prepare a demonstration of the product and more > specifically his capacity to manage many archive's files digitized in > PDF's format. > > For this demonstration, I will try to use the ‘Drag and Drop’ facility > with many files from 400Kb to more than 20Mb. Not a good solution! > > After some tests, I do a performance and capacity check and here is > the result: > > …..File size…….Duration > > …..400Kb………10sec > > …..624Kb………12sec > > …..1Mb…………17sec > > …..2Mb…………40sec > > …..3,3Mb……….2min 27sec > > …..4,7Mb……….2min 30sec ??? > > …..9,4Mb……….6m 14sec > > …..>10Mb………To large to wait J > > > > With the ‘New document’ option, a 26Mb file will use 18sec to be > available in the system. > > > > Well, for files bigger than 2Mb, it seems that the ‘Drag & Drop’ > facility is not a good solution. > > Is there any optimization scheduled ? > > > > Many thanks > > > > Stefan > > Micro Research > > > _______________________________________________ > ECM mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/ecm _______________________________________________ ECM mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/ecm
