Le mardi 13 mars 2007 à 12:11 +0100, Stefan Paitoni a écrit : > Hello, > > The server and the browser are on the same PC. > The PC : Intel Centrino Dual core at 2Ghz with 2Gb RAM > It run with Windows XP. > > The tests were carried out on firefox. Can you test on Internet Explorer ? This should be a lot faster. > > Is there any new version for the plug in ? Not yet, but we hope soon. We had a prototype extension using Java instead of JavaScript, but because of default VM memory size, we had other problems when encoding files. We will probably end up with a native XPCom component that is used by FF extension to do the encoding work.
Tiry > > Stefan > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tiry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: mardi 13 mars 2007 12:02 > To: Stefan Paitoni > Cc: ECM List > Subject: Re: [Ecm] Drag&Drop: Perf and capacity > > *********************** > Your mail has been scanned by InterScan VirusWall. > ***********-*********** > > > Le mardi 13 mars 2007 à 11:35 +0100, Stefan Paitoni a écrit : > > Hello, > > > > On what platform are you testing Drag&Drop ? > => IE or FireFox > > For the Drag&Drop the server side processing is the same as standard > upload. But on the client side, there is a Base64 encoding that is > required to send the binary files over Seam remoting. This base64 > encoding can be very slow, espacially on Firefox where it is done inside > the extension. > > We plan to optimize that : > - change the encoding system (depends on Seam remoting too) > or > - embed a better base64 encoder on the client side > > Thx for your feedback. > > Tiry > > > > > > > > I currently prepare a demonstration of the product and more > > specifically his capacity to manage many archive's files digitized in > > PDF's format. > > > > > For this demonstration, I will try to use the 'Drag and Drop' facility > > with many files from 400Kb to more than 20Mb. Not a good solution! > > > > > After some tests, I do a performance and capacity check and here is > > the result: > > > > > .....File size.......Duration > > > > > .....400Kb.........10sec > > > > > .....624Kb.........12sec > > > > > .....1Mb............17sec > > > > > .....2Mb............40sec > > > > > .....3,3Mb..........2min 27sec > > > > > .....4,7Mb..........2min 30sec ??? > > > > > .....9,4Mb..........6m 14sec > > > > > .....>10Mb.........To large to wait J > > > > > > > > > > > With the 'New document' option, a 26Mb file will use 18sec to be > > available in the system. > > > > > > > > > > > Well, for files bigger than 2Mb, it seems that the 'Drag & Drop' > > facility is not a good solution. > > > > > Is there any optimization scheduled ? > > > > > > > > > > > Many thanks > > > > > > > > > > > Stefan > > > > > Micro Research > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ECM mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/ecm > > > _______________________________________________ ECM mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/ecm
