I missed the war by a hair - my lottery number was 116 when they 
        stopped the draft.  You're right about McNamara.  (Sometimes 
        predicting is easy - in the '60s anyone could have predicted that 
        in the '90s computers would be ubiquitous, rock 'n roll would still 
        be popular, and McNamara would still be trying to figure out 
        Vietnam.)

        Is McNamara getting religion because death is approaching?  Why 
        wasn't he this compassionate back then?  It wasn't lack of brains - 
        the guy has a very high IQ.  Would a woman in his position have 
        advised the president differently?  What would a woman in Johnson's 
        position have done?  I have a tendency to try to reduce things to 
        brain chemistry, and the differences between men and women seems to 
        be a key.

        A former Ecofem subscriber mentioned "The Chalice & the Blade" by 
        Riane Eisler.  "Chalice" is probably the most important book I ever 
        read.  She theorizes, based on archeological evidence, that 
        civilization was NOT run by men 5000 years ago; that power was 
        shared between men and women; and that war was rare or nonexistent 
        until barbarians overthrew them, and it's been downhill ever since.  
        I think the concept of moving from a dominator to a partnership 
        based civilization is critical for avoiding global holocaust and/or 
        ecological collapse (or both).  I wonder if we can get there from 
        our competition based economy.
                                                                        aVr

Reply via email to