Yes, you are right, Kimberly - I got this, too.  I have to presume it 
went to "all."   Frankly, IMO, the less attention we pay to this the 
better.  It's not at all worth our time.

Jackie
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr  2 10:11:25 1997
        via sendmail with smtp (ident liveoak using rfc1413)
        id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 12:05:21 -0500 (EST)
        (Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #14 built 1996-Oct-22)
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 12:06:15 -0500 (EST)
From: Ronnie Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: conservation biology
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Sue--

You might want to put the question to the consbio list. To subscribe,
write to

        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

with the message

        subscribe consbio <Your Full Name>

I would be very interested in the kinds of responses you might get.

Ronnie Hawkins

On Tue, 1 Apr 1997, Sue Daniels wrote:

> I'd like to hear about feminist research methods applied to conservation
> biology (ecology of small populations, endangered species biology,
> conservation genetics, etc...)--a field which is still unbelievably
> dominated by upper class white male paradigms and language.  Thanks in advance-
> 
> Sue Daniels
> Dept of Biology
> Virgina Tech
> 
> 

Reply via email to