Actually, I would not be bored by this discussion. it would be far more interesting than a hundered calls for papers. Please share. megan On Tue, 17 Jun 1997, jude wrote: > > >good grief. this is absolutely incorrect. > > I'm glad you think so Jude, but could you please explain why. > > I don't actually think it would be worthwhile, but let's continue > this, briefly I hope, in private email so as not to bore the rest of > the list members. > > jude >
- Re: nature Gwendolyn L. Griffin
- Re: nature 8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0
- Re: nature fight4it
- Re: nature Judie Montoya
- Re: nature Ben Fox
- Re: nature jude
- Re: nature Ben Fox
- Re: nature Tammy Seale TAL
- Re: nature Gwendolyn L. Griffin
- Re: nature jude
- Re: nature megan e davidson
- Re: nature Ben Fox
- Re: nature Liam Campion
- Re: nature 8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0
- Re: nature Claude A Nozeres
